🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to reinitiate atomic negotiations with the United States as long as it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared fresh requests had originated from intermediaries to restart discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran could not yet permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to access attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Walking a Challenging Path

Araghchi is treading a complex route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be acting from a situation of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more powerful in military terms and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Prior Discussions Unexpectedly Concluded

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that ended with the American leader claiming the locations had been destroyed. Following this, European countries used their privilege to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an local partnership with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that American atomic experts could work within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials claimed three times they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the deal to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Present Status

Iran's diplomats said the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the offer could be reintroduced in various formats if discussions restart.

The US president recently said he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to restart talks, but privately Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from the United States either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of passivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Political Stance

In his address to the forum, aimed to portray the US as a controlling nation that abuses the concept of global regulations, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by military means. He asserted the attacks began with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence difficult to reestablish.

Diplomacy Continues the Primary Solution

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had consistently tried to dictate their demands during the talks. Diplomacy can still be active and remains the ultimate answer to address disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and fundamentals must be respected."

"In case they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and honor, they will receive a reply in the equivalent tone."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the struggle of restoration and rebuilding, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We acquired multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He added: "We successfully passed this war. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to destroy, remains in place. The installations and equipment, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but did not succeed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have become more powerful, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the wake of this assault."